City vs city
Clinton vs Heber Springs, AR
Clinton currently scores 2 points higher overall than Heber Springs, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 48/100 · Heber Springs: 46/100
Clinton is 2 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: Unavailable · Heber Springs: 32/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Heber Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clinton: 15/100 · Heber Springs: 14/100
Clinton is 1 points higher.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Heber Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 79/100 · Heber Springs: 85/100
Heber Springs is 6 points higher.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Heber Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 65/100 · Heber Springs: 69/100
Heber Springs is 4 points higher.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Heber Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 94/100 · Heber Springs: 41/100
Clinton is 53 points higher.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Heber Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Heber Springs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Heber Springs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clinton: 57/100 · Heber Springs: 55/100
Clinton is 2 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Heber Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clinton: 26/100 · Heber Springs: 26/100
No gap.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Heber Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.