City vs city
Barling vs Kibler, AR
Kibler currently scores 7 points higher overall than Barling, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Barling: 54/100 · Kibler: 61/100
Kibler is 7 points higher.
Flood
Barling: 65/100 · Kibler: 43/100
Barling is 22 points higher.
Barling: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 13 features intersect this tile.
Kibler: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Barling: 15/100 · Kibler: 15/100
No gap.
Barling: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Kibler: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Barling: 87/100 · Kibler: 86/100
Barling is 1 points higher.
Barling: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Kibler: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Barling: 0/100 · Kibler: 100/100
Kibler is 100 points higher.
Barling: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kibler: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Barling: 79/100 · Kibler: 100/100
Kibler is 21 points higher.
Barling: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kibler: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Barling: Unavailable · Kibler: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Barling: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Kibler: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Barling: 49/100 · Kibler: 57/100
Kibler is 8 points higher.
Barling: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Kibler: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Barling: 27/100 · Kibler: 27/100
No gap.
Barling: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Kibler: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.