City vs city
Mobile vs Smiths Station, AL
Mobile currently scores 17 points higher overall than Smiths Station, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Mobile: 59/100 · Smiths Station: 42/100
Mobile is 17 points higher.
Flood
Mobile: 40/100 · Smiths Station: 9/100
Mobile is 31 points higher.
Mobile: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Smiths Station: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Mobile: 60/100 · Smiths Station: 18/100
Mobile is 42 points higher.
Mobile: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Smiths Station: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Mobile: 86/100 · Smiths Station: 68/100
Mobile is 18 points higher.
Mobile: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Smiths Station: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Mobile: 73/100 · Smiths Station: 38/100
Mobile is 35 points higher.
Mobile: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Smiths Station: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Mobile: 34/100 · Smiths Station: 82/100
Smiths Station is 48 points higher.
Mobile: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Smiths Station: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Mobile: 91/100 · Smiths Station: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Mobile: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Smiths Station: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Mobile: 69/100 · Smiths Station: 47/100
Mobile is 22 points higher.
Mobile: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Smiths Station: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Mobile: 22/100 · Smiths Station: 29/100
Smiths Station is 7 points higher.
Mobile: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Smiths Station: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.