City vs city
Hoover vs Smiths Station, AL
Hoover currently scores 3 points higher overall than Smiths Station, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hoover: 45/100 · Smiths Station: 42/100
Hoover is 3 points higher.
Flood
Hoover: 38/100 · Smiths Station: 9/100
Hoover is 29 points higher.
Hoover: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Smiths Station: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hoover: 17/100 · Smiths Station: 18/100
Smiths Station is 1 points higher.
Hoover: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Smiths Station: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hoover: 65/100 · Smiths Station: 68/100
Smiths Station is 3 points higher.
Hoover: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Smiths Station: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hoover: 4/100 · Smiths Station: 38/100
Smiths Station is 34 points higher.
Hoover: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Smiths Station: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hoover: 100/100 · Smiths Station: 82/100
Hoover is 18 points higher.
Hoover: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Smiths Station: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hoover: Unavailable · Smiths Station: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hoover: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Smiths Station: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hoover: 65/100 · Smiths Station: 47/100
Hoover is 18 points higher.
Hoover: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Smiths Station: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hoover: 27/100 · Smiths Station: 29/100
Smiths Station is 2 points higher.
Hoover: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Smiths Station: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.