City vs city
Childersburg vs Hoover, AL
Hoover currently scores 3 points higher overall than Childersburg, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Childersburg: 42/100 · Hoover: 45/100
Hoover is 3 points higher.
Flood
Childersburg: 46/100 · Hoover: 38/100
Childersburg is 8 points higher.
Childersburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Hoover: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Childersburg: 17/100 · Hoover: 17/100
No gap.
Childersburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hoover: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Childersburg: 61/100 · Hoover: 65/100
Hoover is 4 points higher.
Childersburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hoover: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Childersburg: 42/100 · Hoover: 4/100
Childersburg is 38 points higher.
Childersburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hoover: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Childersburg: 50/100 · Hoover: 100/100
Hoover is 50 points higher.
Childersburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hoover: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Childersburg: Unavailable · Hoover: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Childersburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hoover: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Childersburg: 51/100 · Hoover: 65/100
Hoover is 14 points higher.
Childersburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hoover: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Childersburg: 28/100 · Hoover: 27/100
Childersburg is 1 points higher.
Childersburg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hoover: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.